Dallas County officials can’t lower crime alone

Published 8:16 pm Tuesday, February 25, 2014

As a general rule, crime is bad. In spite of this painfully obvious fact, millions, perhaps billions, of people have been victims of homicide throughout the history of humankind. An even greater percentage of people have been victims of minor crimes, like robbery.

But at least in Dallas County it seems the percentage of crimes committed by minors decreased drastically in the previous several years, which is good news for all. On one hand, less children have an offense on their record. On the other, parents can be proud that their child is growing up to be an upstanding citizen.

Dallas County officials, such as District Judge Bob Armstrong, cite an increase in programs specifically tailored to combat juvenile crime. With a 65 percent decrease since 2007 — 383 juveniles on probation in 2007 and 128 in 2013 — it’s hard to argue.

Email newsletter signup

A problem arises when considering the fact that courts aren’t supposed to be raising children and teaching moral virtues to our juveniles.

As parents we have a responsibility to make sure our children don’t spend their nights sneaking out, stealing, smoking and drinking.

Deciding to have a child comes with both financial and moral responsibilities. Sure, the courts are ensuring minors aren’t returning to commit a second offense.

It’s our duty as parents to stop juveniles before the first offense is even conceived by teaching moral virtues to our children, rather than waiting for courts to sentence our neighborhood’s juvenile residents to probation or, worse, prison. And just because you aren’t a parents doesn’t eliminate responsibility to ensure Selma becomes a thriving crime-free community.

Seeing a marked decrease in crime is great news, but it’s important to make a concerted effort to continue the decrease or at least keep it stable.